The Agent Test Is Coming for Your SaaS. Here's the Bigger Opportunity Everyone's Missing.
Jason Lemkin dropped a provocative piece this week about Canva's growth slowdown and what it means for no-code tools. His core insight: churn isn't just about losing a bake-off anymore. Products are becoming invisible to the agents that now make buying decisions.
He calls it the "agent test" — give an agent the job your product does and watch what it reaches for. At SaaStr, their own agents built an ad creative operation without ever suggesting Canva. That's a scary thought for any prosumer tool.
Lemkin's right that this is a tectonic shift. But he's mostly focused on the initial wave: tools getting replaced. The data we're seeing at PainSignal suggests that's just the starting line. The real opportunity — and the bigger pain — is what happens after the agents move in.
The Meta-Problem No One's Talking About
Once a company lets agents loose, a new layer of problems appears. Workers struggle to manage multiple agents, verify their outputs, and keep them compliant. That's not a Canva problem. It's an orchestration problem.
PainSignal tracks 128 problems specifically about agent orchestration. Their average severity? 4.1 out of 5 — higher than almost any other AI category we monitor. People aren't complaining about a lack of agents. They're drowning in them.
One typical problem we see: "How do I ensure my AI agent follows compliance rules?" That's a 4.2 severity pain point. Another: "Need a single dashboard to manage all my company's agents." 3.9 severity. These aren't hypotheticals; they're daily frustrations from real operators.
Lemkin hints at this when he mentions enterprise adoption being slow. But he frames it as a lag, not as a distinct market. The builders who jump in here won't just ride the AI wave — they'll own the management layer that every agent-dependent company eventually needs.
Vertical Pain Is Louder Than Horizontal Disruption
The Canva story is about a horizontal tool. But the loudest screams are coming from specific industries. Legal tech, healthcare, construction — these verticals have spent decades duct-taping no-code workarounds onto legacy systems. Agents are now ripping that tape off.
In legal services alone, PainSignal data shows problems mentioning "AI replacing document automation" grew 78% year over year. In construction, AI-generated bid proposal complaints jumped 64%. These industries aren't just losing Canva; they're rethinking entire workflows. And the severity scores are consistently high — averaging around 4.0/5.
A vertical AI agent for legal doc review or construction bidding is a far stickier bet than another Canva clone. The pain is deeper, the willingness to pay is higher, and the competitive moat is better because you actually understand the domain.
The SMB Counterpoint: Don't Bury No-Code Yet
Here's where I'd push back on Lemkin a little. He paints with a broad brush: agents are universally replacing no-code. Our data says not so fast.
For SMBs with fewer than 50 employees, problems with no-code tools are actually stable. Only 12% of SMB problem statements mention replacing no-code with AI, compared to 38% in mid-market and enterprise. Why? SMB users often lack the prompt engineering skills to get good results from raw agents. Visual tools like Canva or Airtable still feel safer, more tangible.
This means the no-code graveyard may be smaller than feared — at least for now. But the trend line is clear. The moment agent interfaces get good enough for non-technical SMB owners, the cliff arrives. Builders targeting SMBs have a narrow window to either make their no-code tools indispensable or pivot to the orchestration layer.
Founder Obsession: The Solopreneur Surge
Lemkin's point about underwriting founder-run companies resonates deeply with another pattern we're tracking: the explosion of solopreneurs. Problems tagged "solopreneur" on PainSignal grew 210% in the last 12 months. These are people running entire businesses with AI as their only employee. They need customer service automation, bookkeeping, marketing — all without a team.
This changes the founder calculus. If one person plus five agents can build a million-dollar business, then founder control isn't just a governance preference. It's the entire company. Lemkin argues he'll pay up for founder ownership because non-founders won't rebuild from scratch. But the solopreneur trend suggests a bigger fork: the best AI-era companies may never need employees at all. That's a different kind of underwriting.
What to Actually Do About It
Lemkin's advice to run the agent test is excellent. Do it today. But don't stop there. Run the orchestration test. Ask your users what happens when they already have three agents running. What breaks? What do they wish existed?
Chances are, you'll find problems with severity scores well above 4.0 — and almost no competition. The next Canva won't be a replacement for Canva. It'll be the control tower for everything that replaced Canva.
The agent wave isn't just destroying old categories. It's creating new ones at a rate we've never seen. And the data already shows where the bodies are buried. Go dig.
This article is commentary on the original article by Jason Lemkin at SaaStr. We encourage you to read the original.
Explore more problems and app ideas across every industry.
Browse App Ideas