Tool Gap Index

What people complain about in Power Query

7 reported problems name Power Query as what the person is currently using. Below is what they said was missing, and what they resorted to instead.

Complaints
7
Avg severity
3.3/5
Would pay to fix
1
Industries
3

What they wish it did

Capabilities people described needing that Power Query does not give them, taken from the highest-scoring problems first. These are individual accounts written in each person’s own terms, so two entries may describe the same underlying gap in different words.

  • A tool that automatically inserts the correct number of rows above a specified section without manual calculations
  • A macro or add-in that safely pastes new data into the correct location without overwriting existing data
  • An automated tool that can join JDE tables and provide component-level variance analysis directly
  • A report that compares calculated variances with GL postings without manual Excel work
  • Automated reconciliation aggregation tool that consolidates multiple accounts into a single workflow
  • Efficient compilation and export of reconciliation packages with integrated documents
  • Centralized retention system with permanent storage and easy retrievability
  • Automated invoice and PDF data extraction tool that integrates with accounting software
  • AI-driven data cleaning tool that learns from user corrections and applies them automatically to future files
  • Tool that can handle multiple supplier formats without manual reconfiguration
  • AI-powered reconciliation tool that handles fuzzy matching, date discrepancies, and one-to-many splits
  • Automated detection of bank fees and partial matches with confidence scores
  • Internal automation knowledge management system
  • Tool for tracking and quantifying process improvement initiatives
  • Platform for pitching and gaining approval for internal tools

What they do instead

The manual processes people built around the gap. A long workaround list is the strongest evidence a problem is real: someone is already paying for it in time. Where several people described the same workaround, it is marked.

  • Counts new rows using formula, then manually calculates row range to insert
  • Uses Ctrl+Shift++ to insert rows after pasting a calculated range reference
  • Manually copies and pastes filtered new data from another sheet
  • Downloads several JDE tables into Excel and uses Power Query to link them together
  • Creates pivot tables to sort out component-level variances by work order
  • Uses individual Excel sheets for each account
  • Manually converts Excel sheets to PDF and combines with trial balance and support docs
  • Stores reconciliations in SharePoint for retention
  • pulls numbers from invoices and PDFs manually
  • uses Excel automation and Power Query
  • uses Power Query but requires setup every time format changes
  • uses DataClean tool to upload and describe fixes
  • hires VA for bigger jobs
  • Uses XLOOKUP or exact match in Excel
  • Works through exceptions manually
  • Uses Power Query, fuzzy matching, Python/SQL, or AI tools
  • built a pilot workbook for own clients
  • sent results to manager via Teams message
  • explained at year-end performance meeting

Industries

Problem types

The problems themselves

Highest opportunity score first.

Read this fairly

These are complaints, and only complaints — nobody posts to say their software worked. A high count mostly reflects how many people use Power Query at all, so this page is not a quality judgement and should not be read as one. What it is good for is the shape of the gaps: the specific jobs people could not get done, which are the same whether the tool is popular or not.

Join the beta — full access for the first 1,000 builders

Join Beta