Tool Gap Index

What people complain about in Procore

5 reported problems name Procore as what the person is currently using. Below is what they said was missing, and what they resorted to instead.

Complaints
5
Avg severity
3.2/5
Would pay to fix
0
Industries
2

What they wish it did

Capabilities people described needing that Procore does not give them, taken from the highest-scoring problems first. These are individual accounts written in each person’s own terms, so two entries may describe the same underlying gap in different words.

  • Automated request and e-signature collection for lien waivers
  • Automatic payment hold until waiver is signed and returned

What they do instead

The manual processes people built around the gap. A long workaround list is the strongest evidence a problem is real: someone is already paying for it in time. Where several people described the same workaround, it is marked.

  • Mailing out paper copies of waivers for signatures
  • Sending payment out without a signed waiver

Industries

Problem types

The problems themselves

Highest opportunity score first.

Read this fairly

These are complaints, and only complaints — nobody posts to say their software worked. A high count mostly reflects how many people use Procore at all, so this page is not a quality judgement and should not be read as one. What it is good for is the shape of the gaps: the specific jobs people could not get done, which are the same whether the tool is popular or not.

Folded from: ProCore, Procore

Join the beta — full access for the first 1,000 builders

Join Beta