Tool Gap Index

What people complain about in SAP

16 reported problems name SAP as what the person is currently using. Below is what they said was missing, and what they resorted to instead.

Complaints
16
Avg severity
3.2/5
Would pay to fix
0
Industries
5

What they wish it did

Capabilities people described needing that SAP does not give them, taken from the highest-scoring problems first. These are individual accounts written in each person’s own terms, so two entries may describe the same underlying gap in different words.

  • Mobile receiving app that allows provisional logging without full GRN documentation during emergencies
  • Real-time physical location tracking that syncs with systematic inventory systems like SAP
  • Automated FX rate normalization across disparate ERP systems
  • Preventative FX discrepancy detection before consolidation
  • Manual OCR and data extraction from PDFs, statements, receipts
  • Manual reconciliation of GL exports to bank statements using spreadsheets
  • Manual review of workpapers for errors and missing support
  • Desktop automation tool that runs without admin privileges
  • Automated approval follow-up and status tracking system that integrates with SAP
  • A standardized, human-readable invoicing protocol with an open transport layer is needed to prevent fragmentation and simplify development.
  • A universal connector or 'browser' for EDI is needed to bridge disparate EDI networks that 'speak different languages'.
  • A desktop application that can automate fetching multiple technical drawings from a web interface using a list of item codes.
  • A utility to seamlessly export and format data from SAP into Excel spreadsheets without manual intervention.
  • An automation tool for Windows that can perform repetitive data manipulation tasks across various applications.
  • Automated service invoice auditing with contract and delivery evidence matching
  • Month-end close management software with automated reconciliation and checklist tracking
  • Automated reconciliation tool that matches webform amounts to SAP wage types without manual spreadsheet lookups.
  • A tool that integrates with SAP/Anaplan to automate close readiness checks and exception tracking, replacing manual VBA scripts
  • Authoritative AI research tool that provides source-cited answers for specific accounting standards (e.g., German GAAP)
  • Automated evidence capture tool that extracts data from SAP screens and directly populates compliance workpapers
  • Integration layer that bypasses Excel as intermediary and feeds structured evidence from SAP to Blackline

What they do instead

The manual processes people built around the gap. A long workaround list is the strongest evidence a problem is real: someone is already paying for it in time. Where several people described the same workaround, it is marked.

  • inbound all the parts without GRN
  • systematic stock on s.a.p and excel but physical parts scrambled
  • spends 2 days running rec'd reports and finding FX gaps line by line
  • posts manual journal entries to fix FX basis differences
  • manually performs 7-step sequence 450 times today
  • Manually chasing approvals via email or messages
  • coders invent new standards e.g. for SAP, or OASIS
  • copy pasting (or even typing if they're reading from paper) each item code one by one and printing one by one to get technical drawings
  • awkwardly getting things out of SAP and into spreadsheets in the right format manually
  • doing basic data manipulation manually most of the time
  • payables associates manually apply knowledge of past contracts
  • staff capabilities used to detect leakage
  • built own tool to track what is done and what is not yet at month end
  • uses normal vlookup for each wagetype
  • Controller uses ChatGPT to ask accounting questions
  • Takes screenshots (snippets) when running reports in SAP
  • Drops those snippets into Excel support workbooks
  • Then uploads Excel to Blackline

Industries

Problem types

The problems themselves

Highest opportunity score first.

Read this fairly

These are complaints, and only complaints — nobody posts to say their software worked. A high count mostly reflects how many people use SAP at all, so this page is not a quality judgement and should not be read as one. What it is good for is the shape of the gaps: the specific jobs people could not get done, which are the same whether the tool is popular or not.

Join the beta — full access for the first 1,000 builders

Join Beta