Tool Gap Index

What people complain about in Innago

6 reported problems name Innago as what the person is currently using. Below is what they said was missing, and what they resorted to instead.

Complaints
6
Avg severity
3.2/5
Would pay to fix
0
Industries
2

What they wish it did

Capabilities people described needing that Innago does not give them, taken from the highest-scoring problems first. These are individual accounts written in each person’s own terms, so two entries may describe the same underlying gap in different words.

  • Integrated rent collection and maintenance tracking in one app
  • Centralized tenant communication log
  • Dedicated maintenance request portal to replace personal texting
  • Automated rent collection and tracking to replace manual spreadsheets
  • Automated property management software that consolidates rent tracking, tenant communication, and renewals

What they do instead

The manual processes people built around the gap. A long workaround list is the strongest evidence a problem is real: someone is already paying for it in time. Where several people described the same workaround, it is marked.

  • uses spreadsheets to track rent and maintenance
  • uses scattered messages for tenant communication
  • uses spreadsheets to track appointments
  • relies on personal text threads for maintenance requests
  • managing everything manually

Industries

Problem types

The problems themselves

Highest opportunity score first.

Read this fairly

These are complaints, and only complaints — nobody posts to say their software worked. A high count mostly reflects how many people use Innago at all, so this page is not a quality judgement and should not be read as one. What it is good for is the shape of the gaps: the specific jobs people could not get done, which are the same whether the tool is popular or not.

Join the beta — full access for the first 1,000 builders

Join Beta