Tool Gap Index

What people complain about in SharePoint

9 reported problems name SharePoint as what the person is currently using. Below is what they said was missing, and what they resorted to instead.

Complaints
9
Avg severity
3.6/5
Would pay to fix
0
Industries
5

What they wish it did

Capabilities people described needing that SharePoint does not give them, taken from the highest-scoring problems first. These are individual accounts written in each person’s own terms, so two entries may describe the same underlying gap in different words.

  • System that prevents backdating of approvals and enforces electronic signatures with timestamps
  • Workflow software that cannot be overridden after approval without a formal exception process
  • Formal Engineering Change Notice software that automates communication and cost impact tracking between engineering and finance
  • Integrated client portal with billing and document notification capabilities
  • Native engagement letter and questionnaire module
  • Unified platform replacing SharePoint and third-party add-ons
  • Automated email attachment capture and filing system
  • Rule-based file renaming engine
  • Missing document tracking and alert tool
  • Cross-platform file sync and organization
  • Automated task management with accountability tracking and visibility dashboards
  • Automated GL account-to-report mapping with AI suggestions and approval workflow
  • Automated permit tracking and status updates replacing manual Excel entries
  • Centralized document management replacing scattered SharePoint folders

What they do instead

The manual processes people built around the gap. A long workaround list is the strongest evidence a problem is real: someone is already paying for it in time. Where several people described the same workaround, it is marked.

  • Typing manager's name and backdating documents
  • Using SharePoint with read-only that can be removed
  • uses a form that may or may not get filled out and handed to literally anybody in finance
  • proposing a SharePoint/Microsoft Lists workflow (but not yet implemented)
  • uses SharePoint as DMS despite its flaws
  • follows up with at least half of clients manually
  • uses separate tools for engagement letters, questionnaires, tax organizers
  • downloading invoices/bills from email
  • moving files into the right client/property folders
  • renaming documents manually
  • chasing missing paperwork
  • trying to keep shared drives organized
  • shared excel in SharePoint with all the task list and who is responsible
  • manual review with accounting expertise to map new GL codes to every report
  • uses Excel to track permits
  • uses SharePoint for document storage

Industries

Problem types

The problems themselves

Highest opportunity score first.

Read this fairly

These are complaints, and only complaints — nobody posts to say their software worked. A high count mostly reflects how many people use SharePoint at all, so this page is not a quality judgement and should not be read as one. What it is good for is the shape of the gaps: the specific jobs people could not get done, which are the same whether the tool is popular or not.

Folded from: SharePoint, Sharepoint

Join the beta — full access for the first 1,000 builders

Join Beta